Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id 4F4288B3.4020705@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/20/12 5:57 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> 3. You're rearranging the page header in a way that I find ugly and baroque.

Guys, are we talking about an on-disk format change?  If so, this may
need to be kicked out of 9.2 ...

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2