On 18/02/12 21:18, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 18/02/12 21:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <wulczer@wulczer.org> writes:
>>> On 18/02/12 20:30, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Dave Malcolm at Red Hat has been working on a static code analysis tool
>>>> for Python-related C code. He reports here on some preliminary results
>>>> for plpython.c:
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795011
>>
>> If you find any live bugs, it'd likely be better to deal with them as
>> a separate patch so that we can back-patch ...
>
> Sure, I meant to say I'll look at these as well, but will make them into
> a separate patch.
Here's a patch that fixes everything I was sure was an actual bug. The
rest of the warnings seem to be caused by the tool not knowing that
elog(ERROR) throws a longjmp and things like "we never unref this
object, so it can't disappear mid-execution".
Attached are patches for HEAD and for 9.1.x (since splitting plpython.c
in 9.2 was kind of my idea I felt bad about you having to back-patch
this so I tried to do the necessary legwork myself; I hope the attached
is what you need).
BTW, that tool is quite handy, I'll have to try running it over psycopg2.
Cheers,
Jan
