Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 4F3A482B.9060407@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2012/02/14 19:42), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> (2012/02/14 17:40), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>                                                           As discussed at
>> that thread, it would have to change the PlanForeignScan API to let the
>> FDW generate multiple paths and dump them all to add_path instead of
>> returning a FdwPlan struct.  With this change, I think it would also
>> have to add a new FDW API that is called from create_foreignscan_plan()
>> and lets the FDW generate foreignscan plan for the base relation scanned
>> by the best path choosed by postgres optimizer for itself.  What do you
>> think about it?

> In short, I have some ideas to enhance foreign table scans, but IMO they
> are half-baked and we don't have enough time to achieve them for 9.2.

OK.  Thank you for your answer.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shigeru Hanada
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stats_recovery view