Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 4F38F90A.1090006@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2012/02/10 20:39), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> (2012/02/08 20:51), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
>> Attached revised patches.  Changes from last version are below.
> <snip>
>
> I've found and fixed a bug which generates wrong remote query when any
> column of a foreign table has been dropped.  Also regression test for
> this case is added.
>
> I attached only pgsql_fdw_v8.patch, because pgsql_fdw_pushdown_v3.patch
> in last post still can be applied onto v8 patch.
>
> Regards,

The patches have been applied, but role-related regression tests failed
in my environment.  I fixed it in a similar fashion of
/src/test/regress/sql/foreign_data.sql.  Please find attached a updated
patch for the regression tests.

BTW, What do you think about this?

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-01/msg00229.php

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/perl and utf-8 in sql_ascii databases