Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres
Date
Msg-id 4F35C710.1030507@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres  (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>)
Responses Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres  (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>)
List pgsql-performance
Peter,

> We've funded some work by Peter Geoghegan to make pg_stat_statements
> more useful, but the patch is currently sitting in the commitfest in
> need of a champion. I'd very much like to see it landed.

Ok, let me review it then ...

> Between that work, 9.2, and Dimitri's extension whitelist module,
> pg_stat_statements should be usefully installable by everyone. We'd
> seriously consider installing it by default, but that would make us
> Not Vanilla, which is something we avoid very diligently.

Bummer.  You can get why this would be useful for autotuning, though, yes?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Peter van Hardenberg
Date:
Subject: Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres
Next
From: Peter van Hardenberg
Date:
Subject: Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres