On 01/25/2012 08:38 AM, Kris Jurka wrote:
> So we've discussed a move to git for some time and are just about ready to
> do that based on Maciek's work. So in conjunction with that, I think we
> should move off of pgfoundry at the same time. pgfoundry is bound to be
> shutdown soon and we shouldn't stick with it to the end like we did with
> gborg. So instead of moving to the disorganized git.postgresql.org which
> only offers git hosting, I'd suggest we move to github which will give us
> more exposure and additional hosting features like a wiki and issue
> tracking.
>
> Since we don't have any major work in progress I see no need to hold up
> this move. Does anyone have an objection to moving things over the
> weekend of 2/4?
>
> The only thing that pgfoundry still supports is the jdbc-commits mailing
> list. So we could send that mail to the general pgjdbc list or we could
> not bother sending it anywhere and let people pick it up via the
> methods provided by github or perhaps we could petition the postgresql.org
> infrastructure for another list.
>
> Kris Jurka
+1
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh<andreak@officenet.no> - mob: +47 909 56 963
Senior Software Developer / CTO - OfficeNet AS - http://www.officenet.no
Public key: http://home.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
