Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j # - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j #
Date
Msg-id 4F157DE3.2070801@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j #  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 01/17/2012 07:33 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Andres Freund<andres@anarazel.de>  wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 01:18:53 PM Susanne Ebrecht wrote:
>>> I would prefer to have an option that the user is able to tell on how much
>>> cores it should be shared. Something like --share-cores=N.
>> Uhm. -j # does exactly that or am I missing your point?
>>
> not really.
>
> if you have 12 cores and you say -j 12 you would have 1 process per
> core, with Susanne's suggestion, AFAIUI, you can say -j 12
> --shared-cores=6... so you would only use 6 cores of the 12 and have 2
> processes per core
>

That looks messy. IMNSHO it should work just like pg_restore's -j.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j #