Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id 4F074F69.7070701@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
List pgsql-hackers
On 06.01.2012 20:26, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The following patch (v4) introduces a new WAL record type that writes
> backup blocks for the first hint on a block in any checkpoint that has
> not previously been changed. IMHO this fixes the torn page problem
> correctly, though at some additional loss of performance but not the
> total catastrophe some people had imagined. Specifically we don't need
> to log anywhere near 100% of hint bit settings, much more like 20-30%
> (estimated not measured).

How's that going to work during recovery? Like in hot standby.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CLOG contention
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2