Re: invalid memory alloc request size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: invalid memory alloc request size
Date
Msg-id 4EFA419E.1050408@fuzzy.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: invalid memory alloc request size  (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>)
Responses Re: invalid memory alloc request size
List pgsql-general
On 27.12.2011 18:34, Ben Chobot wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Ben Chobot wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I had a problem on a 64-bit 9.1.1 install:
>>
>> # select version();
>>                                                    version
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> PostgreSQL 9.1.1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc-4.6.real (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1, 64-bit
>> (1 row)
>>
>>
>> The logs showed this anomaly:
>>
>> 2011-12-25T19:33:18+00:00 pgdb2-vpc postgres[27546]: [74474-1] ERROR:  invalid memory alloc request size
18446744073709551613
>> 2011-12-25T19:33:18+00:00 pgdb2-vpc postgres[27546]: [74474-2] STATEMENT:  SELECT * FROM "asset_user_accesses" WHERE
("asset_user_accesses"."asset_code"= 'assignments:course_141208' AND "asset_user_accesses"."user_id" = 618503) LIMIT 1; 
>>
>>
>> Googling around, it sounds like this is often due to table corruption, which would be unfortunate, but usually seems
tobe repeatable. I can re-run that query without issue, and in fact can select * from the entire table without issue. I
dosee the row was updated a few minutes after this error, so is it wishful thinking that vacuum came around and
successfullyremoved the old, corrupted row version? 
>
> It also happens that 18446744073709551613 is -3 in 64-bit 2's complement if it was unsigned. Is it possible that -3
wassome error return code that got cast and then passed directly to malloc()? 

That's not likely. The corruption is usually the cause, when it hits
varlena header - that's where the length info is stored. In that case
PostgreSQL suddenly thinks the varlena field has a negative value (and
malloc accepts unsigned integers).

Some time ago I've written an extension that might help you locate
where's the actual issue (which block / row / field) and Heikki did some
review about a month ago so there's a change it might work. It's
available here

  http://github.com/tvondra/pg_check

Let me know in case of any issues.

regards
Tomas

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jacques Lamothe
Date:
Subject: Re: UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: invalid memory alloc request size