Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id 4EE75D28.5030603@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/13/2011 08:44 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Rather, I think the point is that embedded Javascript is *extremely* 
> popular, lots and
> lots of people are supporting it, and we ought to seriously consider
> doing the same.  It's hard to think of another PL that we could add
> that would give us anywhere near the bang for the buck that Javascript
> would.
>    

Quite.  I hate Javascript with a passion, wish it would just go away and 
stop meddling with my life.  And even with that context, I think in-core 
PL/V8 would be a huge advocacy win.  PostgreSQL has this great 
developer-oriented PL interface, it just doesn't work out of the box 
with any of the "pop" languages right now.

Personal story on this.  When my book came out, I was trying to take the 
#1 spot on Packt's bestseller list, even if it was just for a day.  
Never made it higher than #2.  The #1 spot the whole time was "jQuery 
1.4 Reference Guide", discussing the most popular JavaScript library out 
there.  And you know what?  Over a year later, it's *still there*.  At 
no point did it over drop out of that top spot.  The number of people 
who would consider server-side programming suddenly feasible if PL/V8 
were easy to do is orders of magnitude larger than the current 
PostgreSQL community.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: LibreOffice driver 2: MIT Kerberos vs Microsoft Kerberos