Re: Sequence "self" change - possible? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Sequence "self" change - possible?
Date
Msg-id 4ED44582.4080306@ringerc.id.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sequence "self" change - possible?  (Lukasz Brodziak <lukasz.brodziak@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On 11/28/2011 10:04 PM, Lukasz Brodziak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible for sequence to decrement its value by itself? Or is it
> possible to see wether it was changed by someone. The thing is that on
> one of our clinet's DB sequence rolled back to the state from 8 months ago.

It shouldn't generally be possible, no. It'd have to be changed by a
call to nextval(), setval() or the like, or a direct UPDATE to the
underlying sequence pseudo-table.

Could someone have tried to restore a backup from 8 months ago? That'd
result in a setval(...) call when pg_restore or psql (depending on
backup format) tried to set the sequence position.

In your case, though, your next post mentions possible database
corruption, so I'm wondering if this is related. If something's been
scribbling over the database files, someone's half-restored an old
file-level backup, or something similarly horrible then anything could
happen.

--
Craig Ringer


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info)
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Database is in recovery mode.