Re: pg_upgrade relation OID mismatches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: pg_upgrade relation OID mismatches
Date
Msg-id 4ECE41A7.1080900@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade relation OID mismatches  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade relation OID mismatches
List pgsql-hackers
On 24.11.2011 07:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> OK, that is a heap table.  My only guess is that the heap is being
>> created without binary_upgrade_next_heap_pg_class_oid being set.
>> Looking at the code, I can't see how the heap could be created without
>> this happening.  Another idea is that pg_dumpall isn't output the proper
>> value, but again, how is this data type different from the others.
>
> I have reproduced the failure and found it was code I added to pg_dump
> back in 9.0.  The code didn't set the index oid for exclusion constraint
> indexes.  Once these were added to the regression tests for range types
> recently, pg_upgrade threw an error.
>
> My assumption is that anyone trying to use an exclusion constraint with
> pg_upgrade will get the same type of error.
>
> Patch attached.  Should it be backpatched to 9.0 and 9.1?

If I understood correctly, pg_upgrade of a database with exclusion 
constraints won't work without this patch? In that case, it should be 
backpatched.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Time bug with small years
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq