Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yeb Havinga
Subject Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
Date
Msg-id 4EC3CDAD.7000207@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
List pgsql-hackers
On 2011-11-16 15:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>  writes:
>> Not sure about the log line, but allowing pgstattuple to distinguish
>> between recently-dead and quite-thoroughly-dead seems useful.
> The dividing line is enormously unstable though.  pgstattuple's idea of
> RecentGlobalXmin could even be significantly different from that of a
> concurrently running VACUUM.  I can see the point of having VACUUM log
> what it did, but opinions from the peanut gallery aren't worth much.

I don't understand your the last remark so I want to get it clear: I 
looked up peanut gallery on the wiki. Is 'opinion from the peanut 
gallery' meant to describe my comments as patch reviewer? I'd appreciate 
brutal honesty on this point.

thanks
Yeb



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: ToDo: pg_backup - using a conditional DROP
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring