Re: Core Extensions relocation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Core Extensions relocation
Date
Msg-id 4EC1B8A5.7070704@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core Extensions relocation  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Core Extensions relocation
Re: Core Extensions relocation
Re: Core Extensions relocation
List pgsql-hackers
Greg,

So I'm a bit unclear on why most of the optional data types were
excluded from your list of Core Extensions.  I would regard the
following as stable and of general utility:

btree_gin
btree_gist
citext
dblink
file_fdw
fuzzystrmatch
hstore
intarray
isn
ltree
pgcrypto
pg_trgm
unaccent
uuid-ossp

These should, in my opinion, all be Core Extensions.  I'd go further to
say that if something is materially an extension (as opposed to a tool
or a code example), and we're shipping it with the core distribution, it
either ought to be a core extension, or it should be kicked out to PGXN.

Am I completely misunderstanding what you're trying to accomplish here?

... also, why is there still a "tsearch2" contrib module around at all?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Core Extensions relocation
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Core Extensions relocation