> Seems you have a sequence called "new"; seems we don't handle that
> well.
Hmmm ... yes, you're correct. Idiot users.
Interestingly, the sequence is no problem until 9.0. 8.4 handled it
fine. I'd guess this is another example of where merging in plpgsql
broke something.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com