Re: unlogged tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: unlogged tables
Date
Msg-id 4EC0EAD6.9010302@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unlogged tables  (Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: unlogged tables  (Sergey Konoplev <gray.ru@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 14/11/11 10:08, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 12:58, Richard Huxton<dev@archonet.com>  wrote:
>> Because they bypass the transaction-log (WAL), hence unlogged.
>> There's no way to know whether there were partial updates applied when the
>> system restarts.
>
> I probably did not understand the "truncate" meaning correct. It
> truncates all the records of the table or several recent records only?

All.

Let's say you were doing something like "UPDATE unlogged_table SET x=1
WHERE y=2". If a crash occurs during this command, there's no guarantee
that the affected disk pages were all updated. Worse, a single page
might be partially updated or even have rubbish in it (depending on the
nature of the crash).

Without the WAL there's no way to check whether the table is good or
not, or even to know what the last updates were. So - the only safe
thing to do is truncate the unlogged tables.

In the event of a normal shutdown, we can flush all the writes to disk
so we know all the data has been written, so there is no need to truncate.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Next
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables