On 11/8/11 1:23 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> So the question is, would a
> patch which does the first two without the third be accepted by the
> community?
AFAIC, yes.
For that matter, Part 3 is useful without parts 1 and 2, if someone
wanted to work on that. I recall some academic work on automated
materialized view matching back in the 7.2 days.
And I can help test whatever you come up with ... I do a lot of matviews.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
