Re: superusers are members of all roles? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date
Msg-id 4EB199A0.6070300@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: superusers are members of all roles?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: superusers are members of all roles?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 09/11/2011 09:40 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 09/09/2011 11:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce@momjian.us>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Is this a TODO?
>>> I think so.
>> Added to TODO:
>>
>>     Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all
>> groups
>>
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php
>
> This turns out to be a one-liner.
>
>

Patch with a small docs addition also. Adding to Nov commitfest.

cheers

andrew



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)