Re: new compiler warnings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: new compiler warnings
Date
Msg-id 4E9D63290200002500042188@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new compiler warnings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> And it would break the code.  The whole point here is that the
> message must be sent indivisibly.
If the new code splits the message, it would previously have been
truncated.  Is that less broken?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer