Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Mielke
Subject Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?]
Date
Msg-id 4E90695A.9040300@mark.mielke.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [OT?] Time-zone database down [was: Re: timezone buglet?]  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/07/2011 11:02 PM, Greg Stark wrote:
> All that said I think this is far murkier than you all seem to think. 
> Copyright law is one of the most complex areas of the law and this is 
> one of the least well defined parts of copyright law. 

Hi Greg:

I don't think "we all" think this issue is clear. Quoting relevant case 
law and considering what position to hold or what action to take is what 
I would call due diligence. If somebody wants to hire a lawyer that 
might be advisable as well.

I think "wait and see whether this is a true violation" is a perfectly 
valid legal position to hold and is not pretending in any way that this 
issue is "clear"...

-- 
Mark Mielke<mark@mielke.cc>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Intermittent regression test failure from index-only scans patch
Next
From: Alex Goncharov
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq, PQdescribePrepared -> PQftype, PQfmod, no PQnullable