On 09/26/2011 07:12 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 06:58, Itagaki Takahiro
> <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to support UTF-8 text or csv files that has BOM (byte order mark)
>> in COPY FROM command. BOM will be automatically detected and ignored
>> if the file encoding is UTF-8. WIP patch attached.
>>
>> I'm thinking about only COPY FROM for reads, but if someone wants to add
>> BOM in COPY TO, we might also support COPY TO WITH BOM for writes.
>>
>> Comments welcome.
> I like it in general. But if we're looking at the BOM, shouldn't we
> also look and *reject* the file if it's a BOM for a non-UTF8 file? Say
> if the BOM claims it's UTF16?
>
It should be rejected as invalidly encoded anyway, as a non-utf8 BOM is
not valid utf-8. We shouldn't check in non-unicode cases where the
sequence might be valid in those encodings (e.g. ISO-8859-1).
cheers
andrew
