Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 4E7F82F1.8070903@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 09/25/2011 02:39 PM, Joshua Berkus wrote:
>> There might be a use case for a separate directive include_if_exists,
>> or some such name.  But I think the user should have to tell us very
>> clearly that it's okay for the file to not be found.
> Better to go back to include_directory, then.
>
>


I rather like Tom's suggestion of include_if_exists.

There might be a case for include_directory, but I think that needs to 
be made separately.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: random isolation test failures