Re: citext operator precedence fix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: citext operator precedence fix
Date
Msg-id 4E7A8189.9060602@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: citext operator precedence fix  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: citext operator precedence fix
List pgsql-hackers
> I think you'll find that's easier said than done (problem 1 is going to
> be ambiguity, 

Ambiguity?

> and problem 2 is going to be that comparisons involving
> these operators won't get indexed).

Yeah, that's acceptable, since it's not any worse than the behavior of
the comparisons now.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: citext operator precedence fix
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor