>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:ishii@sraoss.co.jp]
>
>Hi Ideriha-san,
>
>>>>> Hi, it makes sense to me. One can submit transaction again same as
>>>>> other cases you mentioned.
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't attach the patch but according to my simple experiment in
>>>>> psql the output would become the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> FATAL: terminating connection due to idle-in-transaction timeout
>>>>> HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the
>>>>> database and repeat your command.
>>>>
>>>>Alternative HINT message would be something like:
>>>>
>>>>HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the
>>>> database and restart your transaction.
>>>>
>>>>This could make the meaning of the error (transaction aborted)
>>>>cleaner and might give a better suggestion to the user.
>>>
>>> Agreed. Changing "command" to "transaction" seems more accurate.
>>> People might think only the command they hit is not sent but
>>> transaction is still alive though it's of course unnatural that transaction is alive after
>connection is terminated.
>Please find attached patch which addresses the point above.
Thank you for the update. It looks good to me on this point.
Are you planning to change other similar messages?
>BTW, would you like to be added to the CF item as a reviewer?
Yeah, I've already added myself as a review.
Regards,
Takeshi Ideriha
