On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
>>> multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with
>>> multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL
>>> has had for as far back as I can recall, and one of the reasons ISPs are
>>> more likely to offer MySQL than PostgreSQL.
>>
>> Now this would definitely be nice. It is frustrating that we don't have
>> per database users.
>
> Hmm, what does the GUC db_user_namespace do then ?
>
> it says "Enables per-database user names."
Last I checked (it has been a few years) that was at best, a hack. I
remember either I or David Fetter? Writing about some issues with it on
list but it was a long time ago.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
