Simon, Robert, Bruce, Tom,
>>>> >>> Say what? When else would you have us do it?
>> >
>>> >> When else would you have us develop?
>> >
>> > In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development. I find the
>> > distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
>> > make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety. Any
>> > significant development change carries a risk of breakage.
> You clearly have the bit between your teeth on this.
>
> That doesn't make it worthwhile or sensible though.
The above really seems like a non-argument over trivial wording of
stuff. Can we please give each other the benefit of the doubt and not
read objectionable content into offhand comments?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
