Re: rc1 or beta4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Byrne
Subject Re: rc1 or beta4?
Date
Msg-id 4E4BF9A4.7070600@mdb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rc1 or beta4?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: rc1 or beta4?
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/17/2011 09:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I think you're imagining a lot more structure than actually exists in
> this project ;-).  Anybody can edit that page, and there's no necessary
> consequence of something being written there.  It's just notes to help
> us keep track of issues, not something graven on stone tablets.
>
> The pg_upgrade thing is listed as a beta blocker because I put it there
> --- but that's just my opinion.  If it had proven hard to fix we might
> have concluded that we wouldn't let it block a beta release.
>
> If the plpython thing is a new crash that didn't exist before 9.1,
> my feeling is that it's a blocker.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>

I can confirm that the bug in pg_upgrade has been fixed with Bruce's patch
in commit 2411fbdac448045a23eebf4f0dbfd5790ebad720

Thanks
Dave Byrne



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: A note about hash-based catcache invalidations
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython crash