Re: rc1 or beta4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Urbański
Subject Re: rc1 or beta4?
Date
Msg-id 4E4BE49E.9090502@wulczer.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rc1 or beta4?  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Responses Re: rc1 or beta4?
List pgsql-hackers
On 17/08/11 17:50, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 17 August 2011 16:47, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 17/08/11 15:00, Dave Page wrote:
>>> The current plan (or, the last one I recall) is to push another 9.1
>>> release tomorrow, for Monday release. Are we going with beta4 or rc1?
>>
>> Sorry to butt in, but it would probably be good to include fixes for the
>> two segfault plpython bugs[1] before wrapping up the release.
>>
> 
> It's not listed as a beta-blocker yet.  I take it that it should?

Oh, in the wiki? I don't know, it is a segfault-causing bug, but all I
wanted was to draw some attention in case the people wrapping the
release missed that thread.

Jan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: rc1 or beta4?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/Perl Returned Array