Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)
Date
Msg-id 4E36AA46.2030105@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01.08.2011 14:35, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>  wrote:
>
>>> Does the order of locking of the buffers matter? I'm sure it does.
>>
>> Yep.
>
> Do you mean that the BlockNumbers are already in correct sequence, or
> that you will be adding this code to redo?

I just meant that yes, the order of locking of the buffers does matter.

I believe we code acquire the locks in right order already, and the 
patch I posted fixes the premature release of locks at page split.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: lazy vxid locks, v3
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot standby and GiST page splits (was Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build)