Re: python cleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: python cleanup
Date
Msg-id 4E2D7B22.8040906@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: python cleanup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: python cleanup
Re: python cleanup
List pgsql-hackers

On 07/24/2011 11:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

[python headers set _POSIX_C_SOURCE and _XOPEN_SOURCE]
> What in the world are the python headers doing fooling with these
> macros, anyway??
>
Good question.    It seems unfriendly. It looks like you're just about guaranteed to get a warning if you include any
systemheader before you include Python.h.
 

So either we have to dance around that or we have to give up the idea that postgres.h must come first. It wouldn't be
thefirst time we've had to do that sort of dance.
 

The reason we get warnings about these and not about many other things it defines (such as the HAVE_foo macros) is that
theseare set to values different from those encountered in the previously included headers.
 

cheers

andrew







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: python cleanup