On 21.07.2011 21:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of jue jul 21 13:30:25 -0400 2011:
>
>> I think I'll just revert it though. Subtransactions need a lot of
>> tuning but this isn't high enough up my list to be worth the work.
>
> If it works and is sane, why would you revert it?
See http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg01037.php.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com