Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Date
Msg-id 4E17032C.9060104@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08.07.2011 16:11, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Incidentally, I like that this removes the amDirectChild argument to
> PostmasterIsAlive() - an added benefit.

amDirectChild==false has actually been dead code for years. But the new 
pipe method would work for a non-direct child too as long as the pipe fd 
is inherited by the non-direct child, should we need that in the future 
again.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Next
From: Martin Pihlak
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq SSL with non-blocking sockets