Re: Crash dumps - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Crash dumps
Date
Msg-id 4E114886.4010104@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Crash dumps  (Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu>)
Responses Re: Crash dumps
List pgsql-hackers
On 15/06/2011 2:37 AM, Radosław Smogura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Because, I work a little bit on streaming protocol and from time to time
> I have crashes. I want ask if you wont crash reporting (this is one of
> minors products from mmap playing) those what I have there is mmaped
> areas, and call stacks, and some other stuff.

Core files already contain all that, don't they? They omit shared memory 
segments by default on most platforms, but should otherwise be quite 
complete.

The usual approach on UNIXes and linux is to use the built-in OS 
features to generate a core dump of a crashing process then analyze it 
after the fact. That way the crash is over as fast as possible and you 
can get services back up and running before spending the time, CPU and 
I/O required to analyze the core dump.

> This based reports works
> for Linux with gdb, but there is some pluggable architecture, which
> connects with segfault

Which process does the debugging? Does the crashing process fork() a 
copy of gdb to debug its self?

One thing I've been interested in is giving the postmaster (or more 
likely a helper for the postmaster) the ability to handle "backend is 
crashing" messages, attach a debugger to the crashing backend and 
generate a dump and/or backtrace. This might be workable in cases where 
in-process debugging can't be done due to a smashed stack, full heap 
causing malloc() failure, etc.

--
Craig Ringer


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Full GUID support