Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
Date
Msg-id 4E09EDA6.1000601@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
List pgsql-hackers

On 06/28/2011 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net>  writes:
>> We discussed earlier to potentially block the creation, and removal,
>> of branches on the origin server, to prevent mistakes like this. It
>> has only happened once in almost a year, so it's probably not
>> necessary - but I wanted to raise the option anyway in case people
>> forgot about it.
>> The downside would be that in order to create or drop a branch *when
>> intended* a committer would need someone from the infrastructure team
>> to temporarily switch off the branch-blocking setting, and then back
>> on..
> I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's
> basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage.
> I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry
> sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development
> branch :-(.  Is it possible to block only removal and not addition?
>
>             

+1. Spurious branch addition shouldn't cause us much pain - we'd just 
remove the new branch. Unwanted deletion is more disruptive.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 1