Re: flexible array members - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Brar Piening
Subject Re: flexible array members
Date
Msg-id 4DFA8C0A.7040906@gmx.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: flexible array members  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
<span id="IDstID">On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:49:45 +0300, Peter Eisentraut <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:peter_e@gmx.net"><peter_e@gmx.net></a> wrote:</span><br/><blockquote
cite="mid:1308253785.6721.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net"type="cite"><pre wrap="">This macro is provided by Autoconf and it
appearsto be using the
 
standard's terminology.
</pre></blockquote><br /> commit dbbba5279f66f95805c1e084e6f646d174931e56 refs/heads/master<br /> Author: Peter
Eisentraut<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:peter_e@gmx.net"><peter_e@gmx.net></a><br /> Date:   Thu
Jun16 22:39:09 2011 +0300<br /><br /> Periodically checking my VS2010 patch I noticed that this one broke Visual Studio
builds.<br/><br /> At least mine and "<a
href="http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=chough&br=HEAD"title="History">chough</a>" in the
buildfarm - I expect others to follow once they rebuild.<br /><br /><pre>error C2065: 'FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER' :
undeclaredidentifier
 
error C2057: expected constant expression

Regards,

Brar
</pre><br /><br /><br />

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe