A J <s5aly@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ok. So if I understand it correctly, as far as Postgres is
> concerned the 'mirror is broken'. It is a one-time cutover.
> We then rely on filesystem tools (or other third party tools) to
> get the original master in sync with the new master efficiently
> and then make it join as slave. Right ?
Right. There's been talk of building in something, but it would
take a lot of work to get something which would be as fast as rsync.
So far nobody has stepped up offering to re-invent that wheel.
-Kevin
