Re: max_connections proposal - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: max_connections proposal
Date
Msg-id 4DE207A4.9060708@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_connections proposal  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
On 29/05/2011 4:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 29/05/2011 10:44 AM, Edison So wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me that if the max_connections is above 100, the server
>> will use pooling instead?
>
> No. PostgreSQL does not have any built-in connection pooling, that was
> the point of the suggestion, to advise people that they might want to
> consider it.

Whoops, bad wording.

"That was the point of my original suggestion: to advise people that
they might want to consider configuring a third-party connection pool
like PgPool-II or PgBouncer instead of greatly increasing max_connections ".

--
Craig Ringer

Tech-related writing at http://soapyfrogs.blogspot.com/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: max_connections proposal
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename a constraint