Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS
Date
Msg-id 4DDD0B91.9080300@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to serveRAID M5014 SAS  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS
List pgsql-performance
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
> Does anyone here have any bad experiences with the RAID card in subject ?
> This is in an IBM server, with 2.5" 10k drives.
>
> But we seem to observe its poor performance in other configurations as
> well (with different drives, different settings) in comparison with -
> say, what dell provides.
>

Older ServeRAID cards have never been reported as very fast.  They were
an OK controller if you just want to mirror a pair of drives or
something simple like that.  Their performance on larger RAID arrays is
terrible compared to the LSI products that Dell uses.

However, the M5014 *is* an LSI derived product, with a proper
battery-backed write cache and everything.  I'm not sure if older views
are even useful now.  Few things to check:

-Is the battery working, and the write cache set in write-back mode?
-Has read-ahead been set usefully?
-Did you try to use a more complicated RAID mode than this card can handle?

Those are the three easiest ways to trash performance here.

--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORMANCE] expanding to SAN: which portion best to move
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: serveRAID M5014 SAS