> Yeah, I think keeping a single mailing list server is better. I don't
> think the extra load is going to be all that much anyway -- if we can
> handle pgsql-hackers and pgsql-general, we shouldn't have much problem
> adding a couple dozen mostly inactive lists (compared to those).
>
> The only interesting bit is going to be the list mgmt interface ...
> but that's probably OK.
>
Well pgfoundry uses mailman....?
JD
