Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Subject Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application?
Date
Msg-id 4DC8406A.5070309@timbira.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Em 06-05-2011 21:18, Tom Lane escreveu:
> I also tend to agree with Alvaro that a lot of the stuff that falls on
> the "client" side of the fence when using the strict "can it be executed
> remotely" test
>
I think this idea is strict from docs [1] ("The common feature of these
applications is that they can be run on any host, independent of where the
database server resides."). I agree that is not a good way to categorize
binaries but who bothers? (It is only two categories.)

It seems logical that all "clients" use some postgresql library. So I would
put pg_basebackup on the "client" side of the fence.


[1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/reference-client.html


--
   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Grzegorz Szpetkowski
Date:
Subject: ALTER TABLE doc small thing
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: boolean states