On 05/06/2011 03:30 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> If the corporation became *really active* in extra senses (e.g. -
> handling donations, operating events), that would add some Canadian
> activity that doesn't exist today, but it's not clear that it would
> necessarily get "really active" that way.
I'd be just as happy if it didn't. It's much more attractive as an
entity that does almost nothing.
cheers
andrew
