Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions
Date
Msg-id 4DB71DE9.1000201@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Re: Proposal - asynchronous functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert,

On 04/26/2011 02:25 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> We've talked about a number of features that could benefit from some
> kind of "worker process" facility (e.g. logical replication, parallel
> query).  So far no one has stepped forward to build such a facility,
> and I think without that this can't even get off the ground.

Remember the bgworker patches extracted from Postgres-R?

[ Interestingly enough, one of the complaints I heard back then (not
necessarily from you) was that there's no user for bgworkers, yet.
Smells a lot like a chicken and egg problem to me. ]

Regards

Markus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dann Corbit
Date:
Subject: Re: What was the exact version of PostgreSQL where the column name length changed from 31 to 63 characters?
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory leak in FDW