Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions
Date
Msg-id 4DB71528-0135-408C-B3F1-005D4A81F219@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 2 Apr 2024, at 22:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr  2, 2024 at 11:34:46AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

>> I do like the term "current"  better. It conveys (at least a bit) that we
>> really consider all the older ones to be, well, obsolete. The difference
>> "current vs obsolete" is stronger than "latest vs not quite latest".
> 
> Okay, I changed "superseded" to "old", and changed "latest" to
> "current", patch attached.

+1, LGTM

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum