> On 2 Apr 2024, at 22:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:34:46AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I do like the term "current" better. It conveys (at least a bit) that we
>> really consider all the older ones to be, well, obsolete. The difference
>> "current vs obsolete" is stronger than "latest vs not quite latest".
>
> Okay, I changed "superseded" to "old", and changed "latest" to
> "current", patch attached.
+1, LGTM
--
Daniel Gustafsson