Whoops,
I meant this query (ordering my messageid):
SELECT messageID FROM Message WHERE modificationDate>= 1302627793988 ORDER BY messageID LIMIT 1;
Sometimes this gives the better plan. But not always.
On 04/15/2011 11:13 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Mark Williams<mark.williams@jivesoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> If I re-write the query like this:
>>
>> explain SELECT messageID FROM Message WHERE modificationDate>=
>> 1302627793988 ORDER BY modificationDate LIMIT 1;
>
>> I also get a better plan.
>
> Yeah, but it's not necessarily the same value. Do you want the
> minimum messageID where modificationDate>= 1302627793988 or do you
> want the messageID of some row (possibly of many) with the minimum
> modificationDate where modificationDate>= 1302627793988?
>
> Since you're asking for a logically different value with that query,
> it's not surprising it uses a different plan.
>
> -Kevin
