On 04/10/2011 09:47 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> Don't make "replication" magical as a user name, only as a database name, in pg_hba.conf.
> Is it worth backporting this change to 9.0?
>
>
I didn't because it's a behaviour change, but arguably it's just us
being ever so slightly more permissive, and nothing that now works would
change in any way, so we possibly could.
cheers
andrew
