Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id 4D9AD3BE.8040203@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 05.04.2011 11:31, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com>  writes:
>> Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
>> in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
>> controlled in separate two parameters?
>
> No, sorry about confusion.  One GUC is better.  What I'm wondering is
> why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
> supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.

What do you mean by "supported behaviors"?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.