Le 29/03/2011 18:32, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
>
>
> On 03/29/2011 11:48 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> Le 29/03/2011 13:28, Zheng Yang a écrit :
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>>>> I've briefly gone through the slides. Regarding the 6 callbacks, is
>>>>> that correct to say that a full table scan will always be performed
>>>>> irregardless of the sql statement,
>>>>> the FDW is blind to the sql query performed, right?
>>>> Yes, fairly much. If the feed is large you need some way to pass a
>>>> limit to the foreign side, possibly via table options. I'm fairly
>>>> sure you won't be able to get it via the SELECT statement.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Regarding the previous flickr example, I'm wondering how this 'free
>>> text search' function can be done if the FDW is blind to the SELECT
>>> statement.
>>>
>>> For instance, the following query is to retrieve a photo relevant to
>>> 'panda':
>>>
>>> SELECT photo FROM flickr_table WHERE search LIKE '%panda%';
>>>
>>> In this case, the FDW can only open a connection to flickr web
>>> service and return the next 'row' .
>>> The problem is that there are a huge number of photos in flickr
>>> server and retrieving them sequentially is not realistic.
>>> Any ideas on how this can be done?
>>>
>> It probably means that flickr is not a good example of a nice fdw.
>
>
> Neither of you are being very creative. As I mentioned above, you need
> to embed this sort of stuff in table options.
>
> so you would have something like:
>
> create foreign table panda_flickr (photo bytea, ...)
> server flickr_server
> options (searchterm 'panda', maxrows '50');
> select photo from panda_flickr;
>
This would work but means you need to create a new foreign table to
search something else.
So, yeah, it works, but it's not convenient.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
