Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full) - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)
Date
Msg-id 4D912C43.8040404@Yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 3/28/2011 8:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck<JanWieck@Yahoo.com>  writes:
>>  I somehow fail to see how this complete reversal of who does what and
>>  affecting code in entirely different parts of the system will qualify
>>  for patching back releases.
>
> I don't think any of the proposals make sense for back-patching.  We
> should be considering what's the sanest way to fix this in 9.2.

So our answer to users, who currently run 8.4 and experience 10+ minute
blackouts caused by autovac, would be "upgrade to 9.2 when it's out".

Is that actually what you meant?


Jan

--
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5927: PostgreSQL8.2