On 03/22/2011 12:47 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>> Maybe the thing to focus on first is the oft-discussed "benchmark
>> farm" (similar to the "build farm"), with a good mix of loads, so
>> that the impact of changes can be better tracked for multiple
>> workloads on a variety of platforms and configurations.
> Yeah, that sounds great. Even just having a centrally organized group
> of scripts/programs that have a good mix of loads, without the
> automated farm to go with it, would be a help.
>
>
Part of the reason for releasing the buildfarm server code a few months
ago (see <https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/server-code>) was to encourage
development of a benchmark farm, amoong other offspring. But I haven't
seen such an animal emerging.
Someone just needs to sit down and do it and present us with a fait
accompli.
cheers
andrew
