Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Date
Msg-id 4D87AAF2.8040005@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> Was it really all that bad?  IIRC we replaced ARC with the current clock
> sweep due to patent concerns.  (Maybe there were performance concerns as
> well, I don't remember).

Yeah, that was why the patent was frustrating.  Performance was poor and
we were planning on replacing ARC in 8.2 anyway.  Instead we had to
backport it.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner regression in 9.1: min(x) cannot use partial index with NOT NULL
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache